viagra onlineviagraviagra storiesviagra light switchviagra mexicoviagra vs cialis priceviagra professionalviagra resultsviagra pfizerviagra last longerviagra nitroglycerinviagra premature ejaculationviagra tipsviagra expiration dateviagra zoloft interactionviagra headquartersviagra alternativeviagra in womenviagra triangleviagra without edviagra heart attackviagra or cialisviagra 25mg side effectsviagra off patentviagra vs levitra vs cialisviagra manufacturerviagra questionnaireviagra super activeviagra expirationviagra questions and answersviagra usage tipsviagra kaiser permanenteviagra use in womenviagra dangersviagra gumviagra timeviagra contraindicationsviagra to last longerviagra for pulmonary hypertensionviagra kullanimiviagra jokesviagra online prescriptionviagra videoviagra jet lagviagra headacheviagra songviagra makes a romantic relationshipviagra online canadaviagra use in young menviagra voucherviagra red faceviagra patent expirationviagra and foodviagra costviagra knock offsviagra next day deliveryviagra empty stomachviagra theme songviagra zonder voorschriftviagra zoloftviagra with dapoxetineviagra erectionviagra quadriplegicsviagra and alcoholviagra vs. birth controlviagra naturalviagra going genericviagra triangle restaurantsviagra gold 800mg reviewsviagra dosageviagra young menviagra nitric oxideviagra with alcoholviagra vs genericviagra juicingviagra side effects alcoholviagra fallsviagra commercial songviagra joke labelsviagra definitionviagra effectsviagra jetviagra under tongueviagra los angelesviagra high blood pressureviagra commercialviagra pillsviagra kenyaviagra and nitratesviagra lawsuitviagra kidsviagra prescriptionviagra adviagra vs cialisviagra overnightviagra soft tabsviagra buy onlineviagra generic onlineviagra joint painviagra young adultsviagra 100mg priceviagra how does it workviagra kick in timeviagra and cialis togetherviagra best priceviagra yahooviagra vasodilatorviagra release dateviagra like drugsviagra jingleviagra retail priceviagra in canadaviagra forumviagra cialisviagra movieviagra instructionsviagra maximum doseviagra original useviagra shelf lifeviagra ukviagra doesn't workviagra useviagra genericviagra over the counterviagra versus cialisviagra generic dateviagra super forceviagra lastviagra and blood pressureviagra low blood pressure

9 September 2008

Sheboygan Girl Scouts Fight Merger

Posted by admin under: Girl Scout Reorganization .

Here’s something I didn’t expect to see. Eric Litke at the Green Bay Press Gazette says that Wisconsin’s Manitou Council has actually filed a lawsuit against the Girl Scouts of the USA to get an injunction against having to merge in the Girl Scouts reorganization. They cite the terms of their charter and damage that would result from merging as reasons why.

The Girl Scouts of Manitou Council is seeking an injunction to halt GSUSA’s plan to merge all Girl Scout troops in Sheboygan, Manitowoc, Fond du Lac and Calumet counties into a council that encompasses 58 Wisconsin counties and part of Michigan’s Upper Peninsula, said council spokeswoman Paula McGill.

The mandated reorganization is scheduled to take effect Sept. 15, and the local council is asking the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals in Chicago to stay the merger until the two sides resolve a lawsuit in Milwaukee’s U.S. District Court in which Manitou seeks to permanently block the restructuring.

I can honestly say that as much as I’ve disagreed with or been uncomfortable with national changes It never once occured to me to sue the GSUSA for making them. I guess that’s the difference between unpaid volunteers and professional employees.

Update: Becky (in comments) says that the board of directors made the decision to file the suit and they’re unpaid volunteers. I’m rolling the dice because I haven’t called to find out who Becky is and if her information is correct, but I’ll assume so. My quip about paid staff will have to be read with that in mind and only refer to all the other things volunteers normally grouse about. The staff is not responsible for trying to fight the merger.

Update2: How cow! Based on Becky’s comment I’d already noted that the staff wasn’t responsible for fighting the merger, but I just got an e-mail from Liesl Rice, the President of the Manitou Council, who wanted to make it explicitly clear that the board of directors, which is 100% volunteers, initiated the lawsuit. I’ve never been able to get Girl Scout professionals to give me information before so I didn’t bother to confirm the people who started the process. So, of course, I’ve got people volunteering to give me information this time. Hey, if you’re in Wisconsin and you’re in the Manitou council’s area you should feel like your people have got your back. I already feel sorry for the GSUSA. Between the volunteers and the professionals of Manitou the national organization better make sure to dot the i’s and cross the t’s. Now, if I can only get them on my side to get uniforming and traditional camping activities as the program focus of GSUSA I’d have no worries for the future of my Girl Scouts. Whew! (P.S.: Liesl, I loved you in the Sound of Music. :) )

Share and Enjoy:
  • email
  • TwitThis
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
Possibly Related Posts:

6 Comments so far...

Becky Says:

10 September 2008 at 3:50 pm.

Funny that you would think this lawsuit was decided by paid staff. The board of directors (unpaid volunteers for the Girl Scouts of Manitou Council) made the decision to file a lawsuit, not paid staff. I guess these volunteer board members just care deeply enough to fight for what’s right for the girls. Please do your research before posting such comments.

Thank you!

admin Says:

10 September 2008 at 3:56 pm.

Hm. I am debating whether or not to apologize. On the one hand I did get the facts wrong so I feel I should. On the other hand the board in my area is staffed by paid employees with a couple slots for volunteers. On the other hand I didn’t call to ask about the composition of the decision making body for the council before I posted my jibe. On the other hand I have called and written GS councils for facts in the past and have never gotten the information requested or just not gotten any kind of answer at all. Now that I have 4 hands and 2 feet I feel like a squid so I’ll just stop sprouting tentacles and say I’m sorry I got it wrong.

Becky Says:

11 September 2008 at 10:28 am.

Wow! Your council may want to check their bylaws and state law on the issue of paid board members making up the majority of the board of directors. Seems like a conflict of interest to me. Typically non-profit boards only have one or two ex officio members (non voting staff members) such as the CEO/ED.

» Sheboygan Update Says:

12 September 2008 at 11:26 am.

[...] page so I’m putting up another post here to let you know there’s new information on http://www.boyandgirlscouts.com/girl-scout-reorg/sheboygan-girl-scouts-fight-merger/ Possibly Related Posts: Sheboygan Girl Scouts Fight [...]

» Sheboygan Wins, Merger Delayed Says:

15 September 2008 at 4:42 am.

[...] Seeing as how I got myself in trouble incorrectly opining last time, I’ll refrain from editorial comment. Possibly Related Posts: Sheboygan Girl Scouts Fight Merger [...]

Liesl Rice Says:

2 January 2010 at 1:51 am.

Hi Admin-
A brief update on our case: GSUSA just sent us our renewed charter for 2010 which will make it increasingly difficult for them to argue a merger is crucial to GS success in our area. The council GSUSA ordered Manitou to merge with lost 25% of its membership in its first year and as a result is now struggling financially. The council announced it is going to focus on serving girls ages 5-8 who live in the densely populated areas of the state. Had Manitou followed GSUSA’s directive, many of our members would likely have been casualties of the “bigger is better” fallacy.

Leave a Reply

RSS RSS Notification of New Stories

 

February 2012
S M T W T F S
« Jun    
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
26272829  

TwitterCounter

Recent comments

Links